Volume 15 (2016), Issue 3
Complete issue
Editorial
Publisher’s Note: EStAL PhD Award 2016
Page 329 - 330
‘Brexit’, a Stress Test for State Aid Control? open-access
Page 331 - 333
Opinions
A Star Is Torn: Brexit and State Aid open-access
Page 334 - 337
Articles
Evaluating Restructuring Aid: a Case Study Approach
Page 338 - 356
Convergence of the Analysis of National Tax Measures under the EU State Aid Rules and the Fundamental Freedoms
Page 357 - 380
The Applicability and Application of the Market Economy Investor Principle
Page 381 - 399
The Evolving Nature of the Notion of Aid under EU Law
Page 400 - 415
State Aid Rules and Tax Rulings
Page 416 - 427
From Soft Law to Soft Law Through Hard Law: The Commission's Approach to the State Aid Assessment of Tax Rulings
Page 428 - 439
Case Law Annotations
State Aid as a Tool to Achieve Technology Neutrality ∙ Abertis Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA v Commission ∙ Case T-541/13 ∙ Annotation by Pablo Ibáñez Colomo
Annotation on the Judgment of the General Court of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) of 26 November 2015 in Case T-541/13 Abertis Telecom, SA and Retevisión I, SA v Commission
Page 440 - 445
The General Court Endorses the Balancing Approach to Compatibility Assessment by the Commission for Czech Funding of Sports Facilities ∙ Hamr Sport v European Commission ∙ T-693/14 ∙ Annotation by Jarleth M. Burke
Annotation of the Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 12 May 2016 in Case T-693/14 Hamr Sport v European Commission
Page 446 - 451
State Aid for Green Electricity ∙ Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission ∙ T-47/15 ∙ Annotation by Nevin Alija
Annotation of the Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 10 May 2016 in case T-47/15 Federal Republic of Germany v European Commission
Page 452 - 457
European Commission's Banking Communication: Question of Validity in the Slovenian Banking Bail-in Puzzle ∙ Tadej Kotnik and Others v Državni zbor Republike Slovenije ∙ C-526/14 ∙ Annotation by Ana Vlahek and Matija Damjan
Annotation of the Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 19 July 2016 C-526/14 Tadej Kotnik and Others v Državni zbor Republike Slovenije
Page 458 - 467
IFP v Commission: the Commission Does Not Meet the Standard of Proof ∙ IFP Énergies nouvelles v Commission ∙ Joined Cases T-479/11 and T- 157/12 ∙ Annotation by Adrien Giraud and Sylvain Petit
Annotation on the Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 May 2016 in Joined Cases T-479/11 and T- 157/12 France and IFP Énergies nouvelles v Commission
Page 468 - 470
News from the Member States
The Netherlands ∙ Emma Besselink
Page 471 - 473
Czech Republic ∙ Filip Křepelka
Page 473 - 480
Belgium ∙ Laura Parret
Page 480 - 483
Belgium ∙ Jeroen Dewispelaere and Joren Vuylsteke
Page 483 - 486
Bulgaria ∙ Galina Petkova
Page 487 - 488
France ∙ Nicole Coutrelis and Sandra Caussanel
Page 489 - 490
Italy ∙ Sara Gobbato
Page 491 - 492
Luxembourg ∙ Philippe-Emmanuel Partsch, Thomas Evans and Marianne Brésart
Page 492 - 494
Poland ∙ Przemyslaw Kamil Rosiak
Page 494 - 495
