Television francaise 1 SA (TF1) v Commission of the European Communities journal article Ioannis El. Koimtzoglou, Georgia Dandoulaki European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 10 (2011), Issue 1, Page 139 - 145 The current annotation will start with a brief analysis of the factual background of the case and the commitments made by the French national authorities to the Commissions recommendations. Then it will proceed with the analysis of the legal background of the case, the five pleas that were put forward by the applicant and the Court of First Instance finding in respect to them. Moreover, this part of the annotation will include a concise scrutiny of al
Kahla/Thüringen Porzellan GmbH v Commission journal article Georgia Dandoulaki, Ioannis Koimtzoglou European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 9 (2010), Issue 1, Page 169 - 193 Kahla/Thüringen EStAL 1|2010 hüringen Porzellan GmbH v Commission: Annotation 195 I. Introduction 1. Factual Background of the Case Kahla Porzellan GmbH (Kahla I) and Kahla/ Thuringen Porzellan GmbH (Kahla II) (its successor) is a producer of porcelain in the Land of Thuringia in Germany. Kahla Porzellan was granted State aid because the company was in financial difficulties. Following an in-depth investigation, the European Commission decided that €1
Judgment By Formula: Regulatory Form and the Differentiation of Fiscal Measures and Non-Fiscal Measures in EU State Aid Law Christopher McMahon