Skip to content

Dual Remedy Against State Aid Decisions · Case C-135/16 Georgsmarienhütte · Annotation by Rene Brunner

Annotation on the Judgment of the Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) of 25 July 2018 in Case C-135/16 Georgsmarienhütte GmbH and Others v Bundesrepublik Deutschland.

Rene Brunner

DOI https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2019/3/22

Keywords: action for annulment, preliminary ruling procedure, dual remedy, parallel proceedings, national courts, TWD doctrine


On 25 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down a ruling on the admissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling on the validity of a Commission Decision where the applicants in the main proceedings did not bring an action for annulment against that Decision before the General Court. The judgment Georgsmarienhütte re-evaluates the interrelationship between the action for annulment and the preliminary reference procedure and is, in essence, a reiteration of the TWD doctrine established already in 1994.
Keywords: Action for annulment; Preliminary ruling procedure; Dual remedy; Parallel proceedings; National courts; TWD doctrine.

Rene Brunner is Assistant in Research and Teaching of emer Univ-Prof Dr Friedl Weiss, LLM (Cambridge) and Doctoral Candidate at the Department of European, International and Comparative Law at the University of Vienna.

Share


Lx-Number Search

A
|
(e.g. A | 000123 | 01)

Export Citation