Skip to content

ICSID Trumps State Aid in the UK but Uncertainty Remains Regarding Enforcement of New York Convention Awards in post-Brexit UK

Ana Stanič

DOI https://doi.org/10.21552/estal/2020/2/8

Keywords: Micula, State aid, ISDS, Achmea, duty of sincere cooperation, public policy


On 19 February 2020, the UK Supreme Court unanimously held that by virtue of Article 351 TFEU UK’s obligations under the ICSID Convention trump its duty of sincere co-operation under Article 4(3) TFEU to give effect to a State aid decision of the European Commission. In doing so, the UK Supreme Court also made clear that ICSID arbitral awards rendered by arbitral tribunals established pursuant to intra-EU BITs and ECT will be enforced in the UK. Whether in post-Brexit UK enforcement of intra-EU BITs and ECT arbitral awards will be refused on the grounds of being contrary to EU State aid law if sought pursuant to the terms of the New York Convention remains unclear given that State aid currently forms part of the on-going negotiations between the UK and EU regarding their future relations.
Keywords: Micula, State aid, ISDS, Achmea, duty of sincere cooperation, public policy

Ana Stanič, English Solicitor Advocate, is the director of E&A Law and Visiting Professor at the Technische Universität (Germany) and UIBE (China). She regularly advises states, companies and international organisations on EU, energy and international law and acts as counsel, including for States, in commercial and investment treaty arbitrations. She has appeared before the CJEU and is a member of the PCA. For correspondence: <mailto:anastanic@ealaw.eu>.

Share


Lx-Number Search

A
|
(e.g. A | 000123 | 01)

Export Citation