Weiter zum Inhalt

Jahrgang 9 (2010), Ausgabe 2

The EdF Ruling – an electrifying Enlightening

Andreas Bartosch

Seite 2


Agricultural Marketing and State Aid Law – Premature Annulment of the Decision by the Commission in the Case T-375/04?

Roland Norer

Seite 9


Opinion - Substance over Legal Form: Should (non-)incorporated

Raymond Luja

Seite 2


Long-term Contracts and State Aid – A new Application of the EU State Aid Regime or a Special Case?

Leigh Hancher

Seite 18


The Commission 2009 Procedural Reform from a Private Party Perspective: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back?

Fabio Filpo

Seite 8


Direct Action in State Aid Cases – Tightropes and Legal Protection?

Henrik Peytz, Thomas Mygind

Seite 15


Comments on the New State Aid Law in Serbia in the Context of Serbia’s Accession to the EU

Irena Dajkovic

Seite 14


The Role of Economics-based Approaches when Analysing Effects on Trade and Distortions of Competition after Wam

Martin Farley

Seite 6


Commission v MTU Friedrichshafen: Annotation

Andrés Martin-Ehlers, David Rabenschlag

Seite 5


Commission v Koninklijke FrieslandCampina NV – a clearer Picture of locus standi and legitimate Expectations

Joachim Englisch

Seite 14


Have Your Day (or Say) in Court: The Case of Existing Aid

Fabio Polverino

Seite 7


They Aren’t Dead Until They’re Gone

Thomas Lübbig

Seite 4


Aid Scheme Beneficiaries: Standing to Challenge EC Decision and Possibility not to pay Recovery Order

Michail Papadakis

Seite 6


Judgments of the General Court concerning State aid granted to a Polish Steel Producer – Huta Cze?stochowa

Katarzyna Saryusz-Wolska

Seite 7


Legitimate Expectations in State Aid and the CFI

Wolfgang Weiß, Markus Haberkamm

Seite 9


Standing in State Aid Cases: What’s the State of Play?

Küllike Jürimäe

Seite 19


European State Aid Law Quarterly weiterempfehlen


Lx-Number Search

A
|
(e.g. A | 000123 | 01)