Skip to content

The search returned 40 results.

Book Reviews journal article

Mor Bakhoum, Andreas Bartosch, Simon Pilsbury

European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 12 (2013), Issue 3, Page 617 - 621

Structure and Effects in EU Competition Law, Studies on Exclusionary Conduct and State Aid Edited by Jürgen Basedow and Wolfgang Wurmnest Kluwer Law International, The Netherlands, 2011, ISBN: 9041131744, 368 pp., $155,– (approx. €117,–)

VO (EG) 1370/2007– Kommentar: Verordnung über öffentliche Personenverkehrsdienste auf Schiene und Straße Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 – Commentary: R

Book Reviews journal article

Andreas Bartosch, Robert Ertl

European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 12 (2013), Issue 4, Page 753 - 755

Münchener Kommentar – Europäisches und Deutsches Wettbewerbsrecht (Kartellrecht) – Band 3 Beihilfen- und Vergaberecht Munich commentary – European and German Competition Law (Antitrust Law) – Third Volume: State Aid and Public Procurement Law Edited by Günter Hirsch, Frank Montag, Franz Jürgen Säcker C.H. Beck (Munich) 2011, ISBN 978 3 406 55914 3, XLI, 2348 pp. 378,00 €

Das Beihilfe- und Ver

Procedural Rights Denied for Too Long: Is Legal Conservativism Finally Heading for Its “Götterdämmerung”? journal article

Andreas Bartosch

European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 10 (2011), Issue 4, Page 580 - 581

In accordance with the traditional approach, State aid procedure is regarded as a dialogue between the European Commission and the Member States, in which third parties, whether they be beneficiaries, or the beneficiaries’ actual or potential competitors or even complainants, are classified merely as “sources of information”. In the well known Sytraval case (C-367/05 P), the European Court of Justice (ECJ) squashed the hopes of third parties that had built up, for a shor

An Opportunity to Make Sense – Finally – Will It Materialize? journal article

Andreas Bartosch

European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 10 (2011), Issue 2, Page 187 - 188

To this journal the long-awaited publication of the report and the communication on socalled services of general economic interest on 23 March 2011 is of somewhat historical significance. When this Quarterly was created in early 2002, it entered its first runway with a discussion of the late Ferring judgment. Both the battlegrounds on which various Advocate Generals of the European Court of Justice fought for the “correct” notion of an aid in the specific context of offs