EStAL in Wonderland Journal Artikel Caroline Buts European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 23 (2024), Ausgabe 1, Seite 1 - 3
Never Fear Quarrels, but Seek Hazardous Adventures Journal Artikel Caroline Buts European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 22 (2023), Ausgabe 1, Seite 1 - 3
Article 346(1) TFEU and Strategic Autonomy: Journal Artikel A Possible Loophole to Grant State Aid in the Context of Geopolitical Struggles? Wout De Cock, Gregory Kegels, Caroline Buts, Cind Du Bois European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 22 (2023), Ausgabe 2, Seite 150 - 160 The current geopolitical situation has led to various calls for investment in Europe’s strategic autonomy, for example with regard to the defence and security sector. However, the possibility for Member States to grant financial support is restricted by EU State aid law, leading some stakeholders to argue that there is a friction between the geopolitical need to invest in Europe’s strategic autonomy on the one hand, and EU State aid law on the other. In this contribution, we examine whether Member States could avoid and/or alleviate this friction by invoking Article 346(1)(b) TFEU. This Treaty provision, often overlooked by legal scholars, stipulates that Member States may, in principle, take all measures they consider necessary for the protection of their essential security interests, without having to consider EU State aid law. By analysing relevant case-law of the EU Courts, however, we argue that the aforementioned Treaty provision has a limited scope, and that, therefore, Member States, in principle, must comply with the EU State aid rules when they contribute to Europe’s strategic autonomy. Keywords: Article 346(1)(b) TFEU; (open) strategic autonomy; investments; essential security interests; dual-use goods; R&D; defence sector
Review of EU Case Law on State Aid – 2022 by Wout De Cock, Caroline Buts, Malgorzata Agnieszka Cyndecka and Maria Segura Journal Artikel Wout De Cock, Caroline Buts, Malgorzata Agnieszka Cyndecka, Maria Segura European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 22 (2023), Ausgabe 3, Seite 290 - 328
Review of EU Case Law on State Aid – 2021 · by Caroline Buts and Wout De Cock Journal Artikel Caroline Buts, Wout De Cock European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 21 (2022), Ausgabe 3, Seite 278 - 301
Review of EU Case Law on State Aid – 2020 Journal Artikel Caroline Buts, Malgorzata Agnieszka Cyndecka, José Luis Buendía European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 20 (2021), Ausgabe 3, Seite 397 - 426
Eesti Pagar: A Formalistic Approach to Incentive Effect and Recovery Procedures Journal Artikel Caroline Buts, Péter Staviczky European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 20 (2021), Ausgabe 4, Seite 546 - 559 Eesti Pagar constitutes a milestone in State aid law. This article provides an overview of the judgment and discusses, in chronological order, the topics of the five questions dealt with by the Court. First, we review the importance of the criterium incentive effect and more specifically the timing of the aid application in relation to the start of the project. Second, we analyse the obligation of a national authority to recover unlawful aid, also in the absence of a Commission decision. Third, we investigate whether actions by national authorities (in breach of EU law) can cause legitimate expectations for an aid beneficiary. Fourth, regarding recovery procedures without a Commission decision, we reflect on the pertinent limitation period. Finally, we examine the applicable recovery interest rate. Keywords: incentive effect; complaints; recovery; (recovery) interest rate/reference rate; limitation period, GBER, illegal aid, obligation of national granting entities Milestones Preview: this article is based on a chapter of the upcoming second edition of the book 'Milestones in State Aid Case Law' (Lexxion 2022).
Review of EU Case Law on State Aid – 2019 Journal Artikel José Luis Buendía, Caroline Buts, Malgorzata Cyndecka European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 19 (2020), Ausgabe 4, Seite 468 - 514
Editorial Journal Artikel Caroline Buts European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 19 (2020), Ausgabe 4, Seite 401 - 402
Puzzles of the State Aid Rules on RDI Journal Artikel Caroline Buts, Phedon Nicolaides, Hans Pirlet European State Aid Law Quarterly, Jahrgang 18 (2019), Ausgabe 4, Seite 489 - 509 Despite the improvement of the State aid rules on Research, Development and Innovation (RDI) during the past decade, stakeholders have claimed that the current rules are at points ambiguous, which results in a negative impact on innovation. By means of an exploratory case study and participatory action research, this article aims to identify the ambiguities in the RDI rules. While the rules are detailed and overall well explained, we detect three themes where ambiguities arise, ie non-economic activities, price calculation of goods or services provided by research organisations, and ancillary activities of research organisations together with the 20% threshold. For each of these categories, we discuss what constitutes a ‘safe’ interpretation of the concepts involved. This entails an interpretation that is in line with the case law as well as with the spirit of State aid control. Where appropriate and possible, we provide examples as well as suggestions for their practical implementation. Next to providing guidance regarding the detected ambiguities, this article aspires a contribution to the forthcoming revision of the State aid rules for RDI. Keywords: State aid policy; Research, Development and Innovation; GBER; RDI Framework.
Judgment By Formula: Regulatory Form and the Differentiation of Fiscal Measures and Non-Fiscal Measures in EU State Aid Law Christopher McMahon