Skip to content

Author: Roberto Caranta

  • «
  • 1
  • »

The search returned 2 results.

The Nürburgring Cases and How Much Procurement-Like Procedure Do We Need for Lawful Aids? · Annotation by Roberto Caranta journal article

Annotation on the judgments of the Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) of 2 September 2021, in Case 647/19 P Ja zum Nürburgring eV v Commission and Case C-665/19 P NeXovation v Commission.

Roberto Caranta

European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 22 (2023), Issue 4, Page 404 - 413

The case law on the application of EU State aid law to sales and privatisations is scarce. With its two judgments in Ja zum Nürburgring and NeXovation, the Court of Justice has given some indication as to what was not an open, transparent, non-discriminatory and unconditional tender process, but the requirements needed for such a process to exclude the existence of a State aid have not yet been finally defined.

A Setback for Competition (and State Aid) in the Railway Sector · Case C‑515/18 AGCM · Annotation by Roberto Caranta and Benedetta Biancardi journal article

Annotation on the Judgment of the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) of 24 October 2019 in Case C‑515/18 Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato v Regione Autonoma della Sardegna

Roberto Caranta, Benedetta Biancardi

European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 19 (2020), Issue 2, Page 185 - 192

In a case concerning a direct award of passenger railways services to the old State owned monopolist, the Court of Justice opts for a literal interpretation of Regulation (EC) 1370/2007 on public passenger transport services by rail and by road limiting transparency and competition in the choice of the service provider.

  • «
  • 1
  • »

News


Current Issue

Issue 1 / 2024