Todaro Nunziatina & C. Snc journal article Sabine Fehringer European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 11 (2012), Issue 1, Page 133 - 137 Case C-138/09 gives a short insight to the interpretation rules exercised by the ECJ applicable to two Commission decisions relating to State aid and its validity and issues of burden of proof in relation of State aid. The Case adds further clarification to the already existing case law what the ECJ considers to be new aid within the meaning of Article 1(c) of Regulation No 659/1999. Finally, the Case gives a very thorough insight on issues relating to int
Case T-211/05, Italian Republic v Commission of the European Communities journal article Sabine Fehringer European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 10 (2011), Issue 2, Page 361 - 366 I. Introduction In Italian Republic v Commission1 the selective nature of an aid scheme implemented by the Italian authorities in favour of newly listed companies was at issue. The Commission declared the aid scheme as incompatible with the common market which was confirmed by the CFI in conformity with the principles laid down in joined Cases T-92/00 and T-103/00 Diputación Foral de Álava and Others v Commission. Further, in Italian Republic v Commis
Judgment By Formula: Regulatory Form and the Differentiation of Fiscal Measures and Non-Fiscal Measures in EU State Aid Law Christopher McMahon