EEA and EFTA States ·Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura and Gaétan Roelants journal article Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura, Gaétan Roelants European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 20 (2021), Issue 3, Page 444 - 446
The Differentiated Assessment of the Criterion of State Resources: Instances Where ‘Public Control’ Is Decisive · Case C-556/19 Eco TLC · Annotation by Maria Segura and Alix Mengin journal article Annotation on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) of 21 October 2020 in Case C-556/19 Société Eco TLC v Ministre de la Transition écologique et solidaire et Ministre de l’Économie et des Finances Maria Segura, Alix Mengin European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 20 (2021), Issue 4, Page 572 - 577 In its judgment of 21 October 2020 regarding the request for a preliminary ruling from the French Conseil d’État in Case C-556/19 Eco TLC, the Court of Justice addresses the interpretation of the notion of ‘State resources’ under Article 107, paragraph 1, of the TFEU in the context of an extended producer responsibility scheme established in France. The system requires undertakings producing TLC products (textile, household linen and footwear) to cover the costs for management of waste from these products by paying a contribution to an eco-body, approved by the State which enters into agreements with sorting operators and provides them the necessary financial support for the recycling and treatment of said waste. The judgment confirms the necessity of a detailed and nuanced assessment of the facts of each case when it comes to the analysis of the criterion State resources. The outcome may have been surprising for the referring Court, as well as for practitioners, but follows a coherent approach with previous case law such as the EEG judgment or the landmark case PreussenElektra.
EEA and EFTA States ·Marianne Clayton and Maria Segura journal article Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 20 (2021), Issue 2, Page 301 - 303
EEA and EFTA States COVID-19 ·Marianne Clayton and Maria Segura journal article open-access Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 19 (2020), Issue 1, Page 85 - 85
EEA and EFTA States COVID-19 ·Marianne Clayton and Maria Segura journal article Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 19 (2020), Issue 2, Page 243 - 245
An Illustration of a Textbook Case or Rather of the Principle That the Devil Is in the Detail? · Cases T-607/17 Volotea, T-716/17 Germanwings and T-8/18 easyJet · Annotation by Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura and Lara Manuel journal article Annotation on the Judgments of the General Court of the European Union (First Chamber) of 13 May 2020 in Cases T-607/17 Volotea v Commission, T-716/17 Germanwings v Commission and T-8/18 easyJet v Commission Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura, Lara Manuel European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 19 (2020), Issue 3, Page 372 - 377 On 13 May 2020, the General Court of the EU rendered three judgments on the actions brought by Volotea, easyJet and Germanwings seeking the annulment of Commission Decision SA.33983. In this Decision, the Commission had inter alia concluded that the aid scheme ‘Compensation to Sardinian airports for public service obligations’ entailed the grant of incompatible aid to several airlines that had concluded commercial agreements with airport operators for the development of the island as a tourist destination. The General Court analysed in these judgments each of the criteria of the notion of State aid on its own merits and provided particularly worth-noting reasoning on concepts such as imputability, indirect advantage, the application of the MEOP or the definition of aid scheme.
EEA and EFTA States ·Marianne Clayton and Maria Segura journal article Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 19 (2020), Issue 3, Page 398 - 399
EEA and EFTA States ·Marianne Clayton and Maria Segura journal article Marianne Clayton, Maria Segura European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 19 (2020), Issue 4, Page 542 - 545
Brexit, the EEA and the EU State aid Rules journal article open-access The Future of State aid Control in Turmoil? Maria Segura, Egill Olafsson, Marianne Clayton European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 18 (2019), Issue 1, Page 3 - 14 One of the many and still unresolved questions raised by the discussions surrounding Brexit is that of its implications on State aid rules. The consequences for the UK and for both the EU and the European Economic Area are still unknown. The options are diverse and still open to much speculation. In this article, we will focus on the EEA model. Because it is not that well-known, the scope of the EEA agreement and the way it functions will firstly be presented. Indeed, some specificities of the EEA framework, amongst which the principle of homogeneity, deserve explanations as a cornerstone for the application of State aid rules within the EU and the EEA. Finally, the actual different options regarding State aid control post-Brexit within the UK, EU and EEA will be discussed. To conclude, attention will be devoted to the concerns regarding the continuation of the EEA Agreement as it stands and the future homogeneous application of State aid rules. Keywords: State aid control; Brexit; Homogeneity principle.
EEA and EFTA States ∙ Maria Segura, Alix Mengin and Marianne Clayton journal article Maria Segura, Alix Mengin, Marianne Clayton European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 18 (2019), Issue 1, Page 102 - 104
Judgment By Formula: Regulatory Form and the Differentiation of Fiscal Measures and Non-Fiscal Measures in EU State Aid Law Christopher McMahon