Skip to content
  • «
  • 1
  • »

The search returned 2 results.

Case C-284/21 P Commission v Braesch and Others · Annotation by Philipp Werner and Théodore Plat journal article

Annotation on the Judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber) of 31 January 2023 in Case C-284/21 P Commission v Braesch and Others

Philipp Werner, Théodore Plat

European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 23 (2024), Issue 1, Page 62 - 68

The judgment Commission v Braesch relates to the standing of third parties to bring an action for annulment against a Commission decision in the preliminary examination stage. The Court provides important clarifications on the scope of this type of decision and on the concept of “interested parties”, especially with regard to commitments given by a Member State during the notification phase.


Procedural Rights of Aid Beneficiaries in State Aid Proceedings: The Case of Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy · Cases T-597/19 and T-603/19 Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy · Annotation by Ilkka Aalto-Setälä, Henrik J. Koivuniemi and Leo Rantanen journal article

Annotation on the Judgments of the General Court of 14 September 2022 in Case T-597/19 Helsingin kaupunki v Commission and Case T-603/19 Helsingin Bussiliikenne v Commission

Ilkka Aalto-Setälä, Henrik J. Koivuniemi

European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 21 (2022), Issue 4, Page 449 - 452

The Finnish State aid saga in the bus transport sector has become to a provisional end, as the General Court found in Cases T-597/19 and T-603/19 that certain measures taken by the City of Helsinki constituted unlawful State aid. The judgement showcases various interesting aspects of State aid law, particularly procedural rights of interested parties in the context of economic continuity. This annotation introduces the procedural matters at issue in Case T-603/19 and walks through the Court’s reasoning.

  • «
  • 1
  • »