Micula v Romania ∙ Commission Decision SA.385 ∙ Annotation by Emanuela Matei journal article Emanuela Matei European State Aid Law Quarterly, Volume 15 (2016), Issue 1, Page 134 - 141 In 1999, Romania adopted a fiscal aid scheme and later has repealed it for reasons of incompatibility with the provisions of national legislation on the implementation of EU State aid rules. Within the procedural framework provided by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention, the repeal of those fiscal benefits led to a liability to pay damages of circa € 85 million. While the arbitral tribunal stated that the repeal implied a breach of legitimate expectations, the European Commission considers that the implementation of the tribunal award represents unlawful State aid. The analysis identifies certain gaps in the Commission examination, notably, the lack of an economic assessment of the amount of aid paid as fiscal benefits and the use of ‘normal market conditions’ test for the scrutiny of State interventions that qualify as exercise of public authority. Keywords: State Resources; Imputability; Procedure before the Commission; Regional Aid Scheme.
Judgment By Formula: Regulatory Form and the Differentiation of Fiscal Measures and Non-Fiscal Measures in EU State Aid Law Christopher McMahon